The Journal · July 2, 2026 · 4 min read

General contractor or architect + trades: which to choose?

Behind every successful renovation is a well-chosen contractual setup. Both models compared honestly — including when ours is not the right choice.

The two setups.

The classic setup: you sign with an architect for design and project supervision, then with each trade (plumber, electrician, plasterer…) separately. The architect coordinates, but each company is contractually responsible for its own package only.

The general contractor: you sign a single contract with one company that carries everything — design, execution, coordination of all trades — and commits to a price, a timeline and a result. This is W.A.R.D's model, also known as design & build.

Point-by-point comparison.

CriterionArchitect + tradesGeneral contractor
Contacts5 to 15 separate contractsOne contract
ResponsibilityDiluted per package — disputes between companies are your problemGlobal — one party responsible for the result
PriceTheoretically optimisable package by packageCommitted at signature, contingencies better absorbed
TimelinesDepend on coordination between companiesContractually committed
Your mental loadHigh — constant arbitrationMinimal — sign-off at key milestones

What you are not told often enough.

When the classic setup is the right choice: if you have time, genuine site experience, and the desire to run things yourself — or for a very simple, single-trade project. For everything else, a single point of contact protects your budget and your nerves.

The right questions to ask before signing.

A serious professional answers these five questions without hesitation. That is precisely how you recognise one.

Want to see what the integrated model delivers in practice? Browse our projects — from retail for Dior to the heritage renovation of Le Trocadéro — or tell us about your project.

One point of contact, zero dilution.

Get an estimate

← All articles